I’ve written about my disliking of PETA’s marketing strategies in the past (you can read those posts here, here and here). This week, PETA launched a new billboard ad that truly takes the cake in terms of being downright distasteful.
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve probably heard about Tiger Woods’ infidelity. PETA seems to have decided that Tiger Woods’ family problems is the perfect fodder for a new billboard, which will be rolled out in Tiger’s own town, Windermere, Florida right where he, his wife, and his children (albeit to young to read, but that’s not really the point) can see it. You can check it out below.
According to Virginia Fort, a PETA campaigner involved in the ad’s creation, the billboard ad is, “a fun, tongue-in-cheek approach. … We’re sure Tiger will appreciate our attempt — from a story that’s distracted the world and followed Tiger — to turn it into something positive for little tigers.” (via The Orlando Sentinel)
I think that’s the worst attempt at justification I’ve heard in a long time. I wonder if Tiger Woods will sue, and I wonder how many people PETA will offend with this “tongue-in-cheek” ad. What do you think?
Scott says
What a bunch of a-holes! What a lousy excuse for self-promotion. That would be like the NRA putting up billboards in Texas picturing JFK just after the assassination stating that “guns don’t kill people, people kill people”.
PeTA is supposed be such a dedicated and caring organization, yet again and again, they opt for shock-value, tabloid tactics. Don’t they realize they’re just alienating us? I guess not. Morons!
Alex says
This is truly disturbing. Scott, you said it right on. PETA is alienating all the “normal” members of society with this ridiculous display.
It’s disheartening that an organization that, seemingly, has noble intentions resorts to this nonsense.
It makes me wonder…why? Surely, an organization as well-known as PETA has at least one level-headed person in its ranks, right? They must understand that they have the reputation of an extremist group. Their treatment of people receives nothing but negative press. What is the benefit of this? It’s said that negative press is better than no press, but in the context of a group like PETA; is negative press really advancing their cause? Something to think about. A great P.R/marketing question…
Susan Gunelius says
Alex and Scott, I completely agree with both of you. PETA’s marketing strategy of alienation runs counter to what the general public wants and needs these days.
Scott says
I think someone needs to form PETH, People for the Ethical Treatment of Humans and PETA will be the first target for a negative ad campaign. Who’s with me?!?
Lana says
I am a PETA supporter and normally with them in terms of their causes but I have to agree with you on this.
Emeka says
Totally agree Scott. I love animals…am a pet owner, or am maybe more so owned by my Shiba Inu and I’m constantly disgusted by PETA. Get a grip people. Seems like the kind of people that would turn over a schoolbus full of kids to save a rat.
Susan Gunelius says
Emeka, your comment made me laugh. The sad thing is, I think you might be right.