My new article on Entrepreneur.com discusses how the world of marketing has changed from being reliant on interruption to engagement.
Following is an excerpt from the article, which you can read in its entirety here.
“With the growth of social media, marketers have learned that simply interrupting the online conversation doesn’t always lead to sales, nor does it lead to positive word-of-mouth marketing. Now the goal of marketing is engagement. Consumers want to know, what are you going to tell them after you interrupt them? Marketers have discovered that there is tremendous value in building brands and relationships through long-term social media strategy vs. short-term direct-marketing tactics on social websites.”
What do you think? Is interruption marketing dead? Leave a comment and share your opinion.
Prescott Perez-Fox says
Interrupt Marketing is absolutely dead. The new generation of shoppers and media-consumers doesn’t react to traditional advertising — online or offline — and finds any interruption as a personal insult by a slimey marketer. That’s assuming you can pin down these new hyper-consumers. We bob and weave, no longer plopped in front of the CBS evening news, and reading Time Magazine.
Since marketing these days is about connections, the solution is to become a sponsor or partner, not merely an advertiser. With advertising, eyeballs are purchased; with sponsorship, an introduction is made. Clearly, one is a better option.
Susan Gunelius says
Prescott, as always, I agree with you — and I love the way you say it. 🙂